| Customization: | Available |
|---|---|
| Control Mode: | Continuous Path Control |
| Drive Mode: | Mechanical |
|
Still deciding? Get samples of US$ 40000/Piece
Order Sample
|
| Shipping Cost: | Contact the supplier about freight and estimated delivery time. |
|---|
| Payment Methods: |
|
|---|---|
| Support payments in USD |
| Secure payments: | Every payment you make on Made-in-China.com is protected by the platform. |
|---|
| Refund policy: | Claim a refund if your order doesn't ship, is missing, or arrives with product issues. |
|---|
Suppliers with verified business licenses
Audited Supplier Audited by an independent third-party inspection agency
At present, there are still loopholes in the evaluation standards of most enterprises, which only statically divide technical standards and commercial standards. However, the production and operation of an enterprise is a dynamic process. Automated production is not just a matter of a few pieces of equipment, but is related to the future production, R&D and marketing direction of the entire enterprise.
Establishing a reasonable solution evaluation standard is more important than automation itself.
Reasonable evaluation standards must include the following.
1.Based on realistic needs and risks
The first level is based on realistic needs and risks, which is also the current evaluation standard for most companies.
Whether the technical requirements can be met, whether the most basic requirements such as accuracy, cycle time, and production capacity can be met, whether the reliability, ease of use, rationality, and floor space of the equipment need to be re-planned, how long the investment cost and payback period will be, and Maintenance difficulty, etc.
2.Based on future needs and risks
The second level is based on future needs and risks, which requires high-level participation.
Is a piece of equipment or a production line scalable? Will it solidify production? Will it affect new product development? If orders fluctuate greatly in the future, can the production line be flexibly adjusted? Is there reusability? Assessment at this level is based on the company's strategic judgment for the future.
3.Based on past experience and risks
The third level is based on past experience and risks. On the surface, the automation industry seems to be able to do everything the same, but whether it is done well or not actually depends on the details.
Many plans are good medicine for others, but they may be poisonous wine for you. There are many such examples. There used to be a company that wanted to automate its business because the production environment was hot and humid, making it difficult to recruit workers. But the budget was tight, so I chose a human-assisted semi-automatic solution. The semi-automatic solution is indeed better from a cost perspective and saves a lot of money compared to the fully automatic solution. But what I didn't expect was that after it went online, there would be no one to do it, because at least there were people chatting with them before, but now it's hot, humid and boring, which creates a dilemma. .
Again, automation is not just about adding a few pieces of equipment, but a change in the production model. Whether it is adding more power to a tiger or getting twice the result with half the effort must be judged based on your own reality.
The bigger the move, the more caution is required.
){kind=link}